<div dir="ltr">On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Gregory Maxwell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gmaxwell@gmail.com" target="_blank">gmaxwell@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">.... </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
This would give us an fully supported option which is completely CA<br>
free... it would only work for tor sites, but the people concerned<br>
about CA trechery are likely to want to use tor in any case.<br>
<br>
Thoughts?<br>
</blockquote></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div>I think a tiny number of people would use it, so from a purely engineering priority perspective my initial reaction is "not worth it."</div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">However, as a demonstration of the flexibility of the payment protocol and because it is a really nifty idea that will give lots of people warm fuzzies I think you should do it and we should pull it.<br clear="all">
<div><br></div>-- <br>--<br>Gavin Andresen<br>
</div></div>