<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On 28 February 2014 14:42, Warren Togami Jr. <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wtogami@gmail.com" target="_blank">wtogami@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class=""><div><a href="https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commit/db4d8e21d99551bef4c807aa1534a074e4b7964d" target="_blank">https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commit/db4d8e21d99551bef4c807aa1534a074e4b7964d</a><br>
</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br></div><div>In one way in particular, the transaction fees per kilobyte completely failed to account for the actual cost to the network. If Bitcoin had adopted a common-sense rule like this, I would have had no reason to join Litecoin development last year. This is one of the few economic design flaws that Satoshi overlooked in the original design.</div>
</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Is there any particular reason that patch would not make it into bitcoin if submitted?</div><div><br>Drak </div></div></div></div>