<p dir="ltr">Not a bad idea. Semantics of the word abuse not withstanding.</p>
<p dir="ltr">I don't want to become the self appointed mailing list cop, but I notice it maybe more than others because I almost exclusively read this mailing list on a mobile device. Hence my asking for feedback without publicly calling anyone out. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Thanks for taking the time to reply. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Rodney <br>
</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 21/04/2014 3:47 pm, "Wladimir" <<a href="mailto:laanwj@gmail.com">laanwj@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Rodney Morris <<a href="mailto:rodney.morris@gmail.com">rodney.morris@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> What is the procedure for dealing with it? Is it considered abuse to reply<br>
> to and quote the entire digest for the sake of a few lines of content? Am I<br>
> the only one annoyed by this (if so I'll just shut right up).<br>
<br>
I would not go as far as calling it 'abuse' if it is not done on<br>
purpose. Probably the person doesn't even know he/she is doing this.<br>
Best to mail the person and ask (nicely) instead of complaining to the<br>
list.<br>
<br>
Wladimir<br>
</blockquote></div>