<div dir="ltr">RE: most of Peter Todd's comments:<div><br></div><div>All of that should be separate pull requests. Big Honking Pull Requests are harder to review and are more likely to be bike-shedded to death.</div><div>
<br></div><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_extra">RE: not relaying/mining transactions with OP_NOPs so miners don't mine up-version transactions that are invalid under future-new-rules: I'm not convinced it is worth adding more code (more potential for bugs) to protect against something that isn't going to happen because up-version transactions are non-standard (due to version check) in any case.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">In any case, lets make that a separate pull request.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I'm going to take the lack of immediate "That's a Terrible Idea!" as rough consensus...<br clear="all">
<div><br></div>-- <br>--<div>Gavin Andresen</div><div>Chief Scientist, Bitcoin Foundation</div><div><a href="https://www.bitcoinfoundation.org/" target="_blank">https://www.bitcoinfoundation.org/</a></div><div><br></div>
</div></div></div>