<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Lawrence Nahum <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lawrence@greenaddress.it" target="_blank">lawrence@greenaddress.it</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">[snip]<br><div>
<br>
Allow me to recap BIP changes in discussion:<br>
<br>
- making some changes to allow merchants to offer discounts in case of<br>
instant ?<br>
- allowing multiple signatures ?<br>
<br>
Did I miss anything? Thoughts on the above from others?<br>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Jumping on this thread after reading it all. I am in favor of the<br>discount offered by the merchant.<br><br>Ideally the merchant could get the amount of the wallet *fee*<br>for instant payment (privacy leak?). That way, the merchant<br>
could decide to support the instant payment at 100% (better<br>user experience after all) or at 50% only or at 0%.<br><br></div>This would encourage instant payment for merchants and buyers without<br>(re-)creating a non-transparent system.<br>
</div><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><div>regards,<br></div><div><br> </div></div>-- <br>sebastien requiem - <a href="http://bendingspoons.com">bendingspoons.com</a><br></div></div>