<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
In particular, can this document<br>
specifically call out that a local network attacker can MITM all the<br>
peers.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>It already does, last sentence of the authentication section is:</div><div><br></div><div><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Helvetica,arial,freesans,clean,sans-serif,'Segoe UI Emoji','Segoe UI Symbol';font-size:16px;line-height:27.200000762939453px">Querying multiple nodes and combining their answers can be a partial solution to this, although as nothing authenticates the Bitcoin P2P network a man in the middle could still yield incorrect results</span></div>
<div> </div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">(If Mike would prefer, I can send a diff with proposed changes)<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes please. </div></div><br></div></div>