<div dir="ltr">Although 140 BTC sounds scary, actually it was very minor issue and most of miners aren't even aware about it.<div><br></div><div>TLS would probably make the attack harder, that's correct. However if somebody controls ISP routers, then MITM with TLS is harder, yet possible.</div>
<div><br></div><div>slush<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Pedro Worcel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pedro@worcel.com" target="_blank">pedro@worcel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class=""><div style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div></div><div style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">
Seems to me that it would correctly mitigate the attack mentioned in the wired article. I am surprised that miners are not worried about losing their profits, I would personally be quite annoyed.<br>
</div><div style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div>