<div dir="ltr">On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Peter Todd <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pete@petertodd.org" target="_blank">pete@petertodd.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 06:33:44PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote:<br>
> Thoughts? If there are no objections I'll go ahead and write that code,<br>
> using the same thresholds as BIP66.<br>
<br>
</span>I've opened a pull-req to deploy CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY via the<br>
IsSuperMajority() mechanism:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6351" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6351</a><br>
<br>
Final step towards CLTV deployment on mainnet.<br>
<br>
I've copied the logic and tests from the previous BIP66 (DERSIG)<br>
soft-fork line-by-line for ease of review; any code review applicable to<br>
BIP66 should be applicable to BIP65.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>ACK on merging using IsSuperMajority. <br><br>-- <br></div><div>Pieter<br><br></div></div></div></div>