<p dir="ltr"><br>
On Aug 10, 2015 4:12 PM, "Gavin Andresen" <<a href="mailto:gavinandresen@gmail.com">gavinandresen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Jorge Timón <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Aug 7, 2015 5:55 PM, "Gavin Andresen" <<a href="mailto:gavinandresen@gmail.com">gavinandresen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Executive summary: when networks get over-saturated, they become unreliable. Unreliable is bad.<br>
><br>
> Unreliable and expensive is extra bad, and that's where we're headed without an increase to the max block size.</p>
<p dir="ltr">I'm not trying to be obstinate but I seriously can't see how they are different.<br>
When you say unreliable I think you mean "unreliable for cheap fee transactions". Transactions with the highest fees will always confirm reliably. For example, a 1 btc fee tx will probably always confirm very reliably even if capacity never increases and demands increases a lot.<br>
</p>