<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
ack no inversion. This can actually allow more direct preservation
of existing semantics.<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-July/009350.html">http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-July/009350.html</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/19/2015 9:21 AM, Mark Friedenbach
via bitcoin-dev wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAOG=w-sbOcaogkic2i4A5eZnBQ79LUibsGy0dyKyvQg53ktY1Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>I am indifferent on this issue (the bit inversion), but so
far only Jorge has spoken up. I opted for this detail during
implementation in order to preserve existing semantics, even
if those semantics are not commonly used. This was the
conservative choice, driven in part because I didn't want the
proposal to be held up by the other side saying "this is
confusing because it changes how sequence numbers work! it
used to count up but now it counts down!"<br>
<br>
</div>
I can see both sides and as I said I'm indifferent, so I went
with the conservative choice of not messing with existing
semantics. However if there is strong preferences from
_multiple_ people on this matter it is not too late to change.
If anyone feels strongly about this, please speak up.<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Jorge
Timón <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
target="_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I repeated
my nit on <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179</a><br>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Btc Drak via
bitcoin-dev<br>
<<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
> Please note there is now a PR for this BIP[1] and
also a pull request for<br>
> the opcode CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY in Bitcoin Core[2].<br>
><br>
> [1] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179</a><br>
> [2] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6564"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6564</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>