<div dir="ltr"><div>Initial reactions aren&#39;t always accurate, people&#39;s views change, and </div><div>science has its insurmountable way of convincing people. Gavin [1] </div><div>and others [2] now cite selfish mining as a concern in the block size </div><div>debate, and more importantly, the paper has been peer-reviewed, </div><div>cited, and even built-upon [3].</div><div><br></div><div>Let&#39;s elevate the discussion, shall we?</div><div><br></div><div>[1] Here&#39;s Gavin concerned about selfish mining: </div><div><a href="http://gavinandresen.ninja/are-bigger-blocks-better-for-bigger-miners">http://gavinandresen.ninja/are-bigger-blocks-better-for-bigger-miners</a></div><div><br></div><div>[2] Here&#39;s Adam: </div><div><a href="http://bitcoin-development.narkive.com/mvI8Wpjp/dynamic-limit-to-the-block-size-bip-draft-discussion">http://bitcoin-development.narkive.com/mvI8Wpjp/dynamic-limit-to-the-block-size-bip-draft-discussion</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>[3] This is a very nice extension of our work:</div><div>Ayelet Sapirshtein, Yonatan Sompolinsky, Aviv Zohar:</div><div><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.06183">http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.06183</a><br></div><div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div></div>