<div dir="ltr">Then the moderation is being unevenly applied. Luke commented against my BIP multiple times right after it was published but it took hours for my responses to go through and I had to track people down on IRC to ask about it:<div><br></div><div><a href="http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-January/thread.html">http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-January/thread.html</a><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Peter Todd <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pete@petertodd.org" target="_blank">pete@petertodd.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:27:58AM -0800, Toby Padilla wrote:<br>
> The mailing list is a problem. I'm still on moderation only. I have no idea<br>
> if this message will go through and when it will go through. I totally<br>
> understand the desire to keep the conversation level high, but when people<br>
> who *are* whitelisted can quickly post multiple heated arguments against<br>
> you (publicly) and you can't respond, then that starts to look very<br>
> centralized and discouraging.<br>
<br>
</span>Everyone is on moderation only in this mailing list, myself included.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
<a href="https://petertodd.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://petertodd.org</a> 'peter'[:-1]@<a href="http://petertodd.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">petertodd.org</a><br>
000000000000000008320874843f282f554aa2436290642fcfa81e5a01d78698<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>