<p dir="ltr">I do like that the volume of emails has been reduced substantially. I used to delete hordes of dev emails because I couldn&#39;t keep up. At least now I feel like I&#39;m able to skim most things that look interesting and I get to assume that if the subject seems relevant to me the content is worthwhile.</p>
<p dir="ltr">My life has improved because of the changes.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 23, 2016 8:08 PM, &quot;Dave Scotese via bitcoin-dev&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>+1<br></div>The distinction we are making importantly requires that contributors provide readers with another thing to say in favor of something - another thing which is different than &quot;X people support this instead of only X-1 people.&quot;  Evidence trumps votes.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Gavin via bitcoin-dev <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target="_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span><br>
&gt; On Jan 23, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target="_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I would extend this to say that the technical explanation also should<br>
&gt; contribute uniquely to the conversation; a +1 with an explanation<br>
&gt; the last +1 gave isn&#39;t useful.<br>
<br>
</span>Yes, comments should contribute to the discussion, with either technical discussion or additional relevant data. I think a +1 like the following should be encouraged:<br>
<br>
&quot;+1: we had eleven customer support tickets in just the last week that would have been prevented if XYZ.<br>
<br>
Jane Doe, CTO CoinBitChainBasely.com&quot;<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target="_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div><div dir="ltr">I like to provide some work at no charge to prove my value. Do you need a techie?  <br>I own <a href="http://www.litmocracy.com" target="_blank">Litmocracy</a> and <a href="http://www.memeracing.net" target="_blank">Meme Racing</a> (in alpha). <br>I&#39;m the webmaster for <a href="http://www.voluntaryist.com" target="_blank">The Voluntaryist</a> which now accepts Bitcoin.<br>I also code for <a href="http://dollarvigilante.com/" target="_blank">The Dollar Vigilante</a>.<br>&quot;He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules&quot; - Satoshi Nakamoto</div></div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>