<div dir="ltr"><div><div>- no quadratic hashing solution <br></div>- no way to prevent spamming the network to blow up block sizes<br></div>- no mention of release schedule/consensus levels, etc. should be mentioned<br><div>- this is similar to other BIP already in place... see BIP107<br><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:08 AM, ashish khandekar via bitcoin-dev <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target="_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Should a BIP be submitted or are there any suggestions for the proposal ?</div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.<wbr>linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-<wbr>dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>