<div dir="ltr"><span class="gmail-im" style="font-size:12.8px"><div><span style="font-size:12.8px">>> With a tightening of the rule set, a hash power minority that has not upgraded will not produce a minority branch; instead they will simply have any invalid blocks they produce orphaned, serving as a wake-up call t>o upgrade.</span><br></div><div><br></div></span><div style="font-size:12.8px">> False. With bip9-based soft-fork-based activation of segwit, miner blocks will not be orphaned unless they are intentionally segwit-invalid (which they currently are not). If you have told miners otherwise, let me know.<br><br>He stated that "any invalid blocks they produce" will be orphaned. This is not false. If non-upgraded miners do not produce blocks that are invalid per the new rules, their blocks will not be orphaned. This is consistent with Peter's comment.</div><div style="font-size:12.8px"><br></div><div style="font-size:12.8px">-Trevin</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target="_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="">On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target="_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.<wbr>linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div><div>With a tightening of the rule set, a hash power minority that has not upgraded will not produce a minority branch; instead they will simply have any invalid blocks they produce orphaned, serving as a wake-up call to upgrade.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>False. With bip9-based soft-fork-based activation of segwit, miner blocks will not be orphaned unless they are intentionally segwit-invalid (which they currently are not). If you have told miners otherwise, let me know.</div><div><br></div></div><div class="m_8979519589113278200gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">- Bryan<br><a href="http://heybryan.org/" target="_blank">http://heybryan.org/</a><br><a href="tel:(512)%20203-0507" value="+15122030507" target="_blank">1 512 203 0507</a></div>
</div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.<wbr>linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-<wbr>dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>