<div dir="auto"><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" dir="auto"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra" dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote">Den 1 apr. 2017 16:35 skrev "Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev" <<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>>:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="quoted-text">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA256<br>
<br>
</div><div class="quoted-text">On 03/31/2017 11:18 PM, Jared Lee Richardson wrote:<br>
>> If a typical personal computer cannot run a node there is no<br>
>> security.<br>
><br>
</div>> If you can't describe an attack that is made possible when typical<br>
> personal computers can't run nodes, this kind of logic has no place<br>
> in this discussion.<br>
<br>
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally<br>
controlled networks..."</blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">That's what's so great about Bitcoin. The blockchain is the same everywhere. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">So if you can connect to private peers in several jurisdictions, chances are they won't all be lying to you in the exact same way. Which is what they would need to do to fool you. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">If you run your own and can't protect it, they'll just hack your node and make it lie to you. </div></div>