<div dir="auto">Pretty sure these non interactive sigs are more secure.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Sun, Jul 8, 2018, 5:02 PM Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Tim Ruffing via bitcoin-dev<br>
&lt;<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; so what<br>
&gt; you want is possible already with Schnorr signatures.<br>
<br>
As also described in &quot;Multisignatures and Threshold Signatures&quot; in the BIP.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>