<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000">You might be interested in <a href="https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/1066.pdf">https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/1066.pdf</a> which claims that you can make CT computationally hiding and binding, see section 4.6.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000"><br></div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)">with respect to utreexo, you might review <a href="https://github.com/mit-dci/utreexo/discussions/249?sort=new">https://github.com/mit-dci/utreexo/discussions/249?sort=new</a> which discusses tradeoffs between different accumulator designs. With a swap tree, old things that never move more or less naturally "fall leftward", although there are reasons to prefer alternative designs.</div><br></div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div></div>