<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">This list is for development purposes not hearsay or speculation. If F2Pool would like to say something this is the place otherwise it’s hearsay.<div><br></div><div>Have an excellent day!<br><div><br>On Oct 12, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Phillip Katete via Bitcoin-segwit2x <<a href="mailto:bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">We can safely and accurately deduce overwhelming support for 2x from bit 4/BIP91 support because segwit only voting/signalling, despite being open for an extended period of time, never even achieved / sustained even half the required threshold
until the NYA.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="border:none;padding:0cm"><b>From: </b><a href="mailto:james.hilliard1@gmail.com">James Hilliard</a><br>
<b>Sent: </b>12 October 2017 18:31<br>
<b>To: </b><a href="mailto:pekatete@hotmail.com">Phillip Katete</a><br>
<b>Cc: </b><a href="mailto:brian@ob1.io">brian@ob1.io</a>; <a href="mailto:bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org">
bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [Bitcoin-segwit2x] F2Pool backing out of NYA - Fork still happening?</p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">SegWit2x consists of BIP91 and a 2X HF, however bit 4 is not required<br>
to activate the 2X HF, it's only used to activate BIP91. Bit 4<br>
signalling is not an accurate indication of 2X HF support, it's only<br>
an indicator for BIP91 support.<br>
<br>
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Phillip Katete <<a href="mailto:pekatete@hotmail.com">pekatete@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Thanks for clearing that up, at least we are now clear that without<br>
> SegWit2x, segwit would never have been activated seeing the pre bit 4<br>
> signalling on bit 1 never sustained anything near 35% (thus segwit had no<br>
> chance of being activated).<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> From: James Hilliard<br>
> Sent: 12 October 2017 18:13<br>
> To: Phillip Katete<br>
> Cc: <a href="mailto:brian@ob1.io">brian@ob1.io</a>; <a href="mailto:bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-segwit2x] F2Pool backing out of NYA - Fork still<br>
> happening?<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> That's incorrect, f2pool was signalling on bit 1 well before bit 4.<br>
> The 2X hard fork activation logic in btc1 is also not triggered by bit<br>
> 4, it is triggered by the bit 1 activation of segwit regardless of<br>
> whether or not there was a bit 4 activation, bit 4 activation only<br>
> triggered BIP91 mandatory signalling.<br>
><br>
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Phillip Katete via Bitcoin-segwit2x<br>
> <<a href="mailto:bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> Whatever he may say he agreed to, the facts are that he voted to activate<br>
>> and lock-in SegWit2x on bit 4 (before voting on bit 1 to get the legacy<br>
>> clients activated and locked-in too).<br>
>><br>
>> Despite the sabre rattling, f2pool will end up on the majority chain as<br>
>> they<br>
>> are not in the space to prop up core.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> From: Brian Hoffman via Bitcoin-segwit2x<br>
>> Sent: 12 October 2017 16:56<br>
>> To: Peter <a href="http://BitcoinReminder.com">BitcoinReminder.com</a>; Peter Todd via Bitcoin-segwit2x<br>
>> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-segwit2x] F2Pool backing out of NYA - Fork still<br>
>> happening?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Where have you been? Wang Chun has said they never were agreed to NYA post<br>
>> segwit so what’s your point exactly?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> It’s obvious that there will be a chain split at this point.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:53 AM Peter <a href="http://BitcoinReminder.com">BitcoinReminder.com</a> via<br>
>> Bitcoin-segwit2x <<a href="mailto:bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> I was just pointing out that F2Pool just stopped NYA signaling some hours<br>
>> ago - which is a new information.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> And still nobody answered my question if you know acknowledge that there<br>
>> will be a chain split for sure and you are intentionally splitting off?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Am 12.10.2017 um 17:50 schrieb Jeff Garzik <<a href="mailto:jeff@bloq.com">jeff@bloq.com</a>>:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> It is information over a month old. See counter.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org">Bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
>> <a href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-segwit2x">
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-segwit2x</a><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>><br>
>> Brian Hoffman<br>
>><br>
>> President<br>
>><br>
>> OB1<br>
>><br>
>> (571) 205-4967<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org">Bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
>> <a href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-segwit2x">
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-segwit2x</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Bitcoin-segwit2x mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org">Bitcoin-segwit2x@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-segwit2x">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-segwit2x</a></span><br></div></blockquote></div></body></html>