<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Tim Bird <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tim.bird@am.sony.com">tim.bird@am.sony.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 01/23/2012 03:20 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:<br>
> Please see the following. We can drop pmem from our effort possibly. Any<br>
> thoughts and ideas.<br>
<br>
</div>I'd say let's submit a patch to remove it from staging,<br>
explaining what Dima said.<br>
<br>
Shuah - can you do that?<br>
-- Tim<br></blockquote><div><br>Tim,<br><br>Yes. I get the patch ready and send it.<br><br>-- Shuah <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
> From: *Dima Zavin* <<a href="mailto:dima@android.com">dima@android.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:dima@android.com">dima@android.com</a>>><br>
<div class="im">>><br>
>> We really should just get rid of pmem.c altogether. We will remove it<br>
>> from our android common tree too. We don't actually use it anymore in<br>
>> any of our products. There are some legacy users of it, like Qualcomm,<br>
>> but I'm sure they have a bunch of patches on top of it and thus are<br>
>> maintaining it separately anyway.<br>
>><br>
>> --Dima<br>
<br>
</div>=============================<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">Tim Bird<br>
Architecture Group Chair, CE Workgroup of the Linux Foundation<br>
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Network Entertainment<br>
=============================<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br>