[PATCH] [RFC] c/r: Add UTS support

[Eric W. Biederman]

Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano at free.fr> writes:

> Yes, this is an alternative. Maybe, I will say something stupid but IMO 
> the "maycheckpoint" will depends on what you assume you have for the CR:
>     1) the container is instantiated in one step, that is 
> clone(mycloneflags) and that's all, any other clone/unshare is 
> forbidden. In this case, you can concentrate the code in the nsproxy 
> structure.
>     2) the container can be instantiated in several steps, that is 
> several clone/unshare but with different namespaces. In this case, you 
> have to take care of all the namespaces and do a "maycheckpoint" for 
> each of them.

Please excuse me for jumping in late.

unshare/clone are irrelevant.  Think passing of file descriptors
in unix domain sockets.

Eric