[fhs-discuss] FHS/LSB Updates

Mats Wichmann mats at wichmann.us
Thu Nov 24 13:49:37 UTC 2011


On 11/23/2011 04:17 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:

> In this context, is "we" Fedora, or someone else?  I'm aware of
> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove>, but don't know of its
> current status in Fedora or elsewhere.  Is this now considered a
> requirement, rather than a proposal?

Neither exactly, I guess.

I was trying to comment on it in light of FHS's role to document 
practice rather than set policy.  Perhaps premature. I know not everyone 
agrees FHS should be entirely passive.

Anyway this discussion has turned over a few rocks that show some 
weaknesses in wording in this area... I wish we had the bugtracker back 
but I suppose this thread will stay in the archive for when it's 
possible to get back to work on FHS.   I do have a branch of fhs-spec 
here, it's true.


More information about the fhs-discuss mailing list