<div dir="auto">Was approaching more so from the angle of a node new node with no existing channels seeking to bootstrap connections to the network.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">-- Sent from my Spaceship </div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Fri, Nov 9, 2018, 9:10 AM Anthony Towns &lt;<a href="mailto:aj@erisian.com.au">aj@erisian.com.au</a> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 05:32:01PM +1030, Olaoluwa Osuntokun wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; A node, via their node_announcement,<br>
&gt; Most implementations today will ignore node announcements from nodes that<br>
&gt; don&#39;t have any channels, in order to maintain the smallest routing set<br>
&gt; possible (no zombies, etc). It seems for this to work, we would need to undo<br>
&gt; this at a global scale to ensure these announcements propagate?<br>
<br>
Having incoming capacity from a random node with no other channels doesn&#39;t<br>
seem useful though? (It&#39;s not useful for nodes that don&#39;t have incoming<br>
capacity of their own, either)<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
aj<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Lightning-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>