<div dir="ltr">Hi,<br><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 7 May 2013 10:28, Renato Golin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:renato.golin@linaro.org" target="_blank">renato.golin@linaro.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">One comment, though: don't use different versions of Clang and LLVM. Even though they're generally unrelated, this is not always true and the problems that might arise because of that are not always trivial to reduce. Since you're compiling a pretty heavy source tree, you're in for a bit of a nightmare. ;)</div>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I know -- they aren't actually different versions.<br></div><div>The svn revisions in the filenames are the "Last Changed Rev:" ID from svn (so they will always be close but never the same).<br>
</div><div><br>While we could just take the "Revision:" ID instead and get identical numbers, I preferred to look at the last changed rev because it makes it easier to spot in what build something actually changed (e.g. if I'm looking for a fix for a clang problem and I see only the LLVM revision has increased, I know I don't have to check the newer build).<br>
<br></div><div>Not sure if my reasoning there makes sense - there's obviously also reasons to just go with the "Revision:" ID...<br><br>ttyl<br>bero<br></div></div></div></div></div>