[lsb-discuss] plugins

[Darrin Thompson]

Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Darrin Thompson (darrint at progeny.com) said: 
> 
>>Perhaps I state that too broadly. My take is, the whole point of having 
>>a standard is to be able to depend on things being a certain way. If LSB 
>>contains a mozilla plugin ABI, mozilla plugin packaging standard, and 
>>mozilla related FHS, then plugin writers can produce packages that either:
> 
> 
> (coming in late on the conversation)
> 
> Does this imply actual standardization of the browser first? Because,
> well, without that, I don't see the point.
> 

Yes.

--
Darrin