<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Robert Schweikert <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rjschwei@suse.com">rjschwei@suse.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi,<br>
<br>
I've have some preliminary results for DBus integration.<br>
<br>
libdbus has 333 interfaces marked as GLOBAL, all of these appear to be fair game for ISVs. There's no ranking in order of importance. However, I have received somewhat mixed signal on whether or not we should concentrate on libdbus at all. From my point of view I do not see how we can claim that LSB supports DBus if we do not include these 333 interfaces.</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>again resorting to Navigator, there's are some common threads in the apps listed which use libdbus:</div><div><br></div><div>browsers - firefox, chrome, seamonkey, epiphany</div><div>mailers - thunderbird, evolution</div>
<div>chat programs - pidgin, gaim</div><div>programs dealing with "media" - vlc, tracker, bmpx, rawstudio, k3b, nautilus-cd-burner</div><div><br></div><div>and so on.</div><div> </div></div>