[Lsb-infrastructure] adding functions-signature-checker to autobuild

[Andrey Ponomarenko]

Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
>   
>> Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Jeff Licquia wrote:
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>>> Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Could anybody add lsb-functions-signature-checker and
>>>>>> moblin-functions-signature-checker-data to the autobuild system?
>>>>>> They have been already added into bazaar at
>>>>>> http://bzr.linux-foundation.org/lsb/devel/lsb-functions-signature-checker
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> http://bzr.linux-foundation.org/moblin/devel/moblin-functions-signature-checker-data
>>>>>>
>>>>>>           
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Added.  Both have built successfully at least once.  I expect that
>>>>> the packages will be on the FTP server within an hour or so (if
>>>>> they're not there already). 
>>>>>
>>>>> FWIW, I did have to make one change to the packaging part of
>>>>> moblin-functions-signature-checker-data before it would build
>>>>> correctly on the autobuilder. 
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>>> as a package name that's uncomfortably long...
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> Yes, a package name is too long, but we can't invent something better.
>>> Do you have any ideas?
>>>     
>>>       
>> lsb-sigchk and either
>> lsb-sigchk-moblin-data or
>> moblin-sigchk-data
>>
>> ??
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
> It is a good idea, I will rename tools to lsb-sigchk and
> moblin-sigchk-data accordingly.Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> lsb-infrastructure mailing list
> lsb-infrastructure at lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-infrastructure
>
>   
I have renamed both packages in the bazaar (new names are: lsb-sigchk,
moblin-sigchk-data)
and possibly it need some changes in the autobuild.