[Accessibility] For today's call--Sec1a
willy at fc.hp.com
Wed Sep 10 11:15:22 PDT 2003
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 01:46:24PM -0400, Janina Sajka wrote:
> Far too often people with disabilities are excluded from participation
> in the benefits that technology provides in society today. Though it
> may be unintentional, this exclusion remains far too common because the
> needs of users who are persons with disabilities
"users who are persons with disabilities" sounds clumsy to me. How
about simply "users with disabilities"?
> are rarely factored appropriately (if at all) in the design process.
I think we need a preposition with "factored", like "factored in",
but I don't see a nice way to word it. How about replacing it with
> Consequently, many
> of today's technology products and services remain inaccessible to,
> or only marginally usable by persons with disabilities. However, it has
> also been widely demonstrated that technology can enhance the lives of
> persons with disabilities profoundly.
Dangling adverb, how about "... that technology can profoundly enhance
the lives ...".
> A properly designed technology
> tool is often a disabled person's best choice for active participation
> in society--whether at home, at work or at play.
You went out of your way to avoid saying "disabled person" a couple of
times earlier -- do you want to avoid it here too?
> * enable individuals who are blind or visually impaired to
> read online text. Often user interfaces programmatically
> prevent or severely encumber the users ability to read and
> traverse the screen by supporting only iconic and mouse
> driven user interfaces.
I don't think "iconic" reads very well here... how about bringing back
an acronym from the late 80s, "WIMP" (Windows, Icons, Menus & Pointer)
to replace "iconic and mouse driven".
It's always legal to use Linux (TM) systems
More information about the Accessibility