[Accessibility] PROPOSAL: Accessible Document
Harald Fernengel
harry at kdevelop.org
Mon May 2 08:38:17 PDT 2005
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 17:54, Bill Haneman wrote:
> On the GNOME platform it includes powerful performance enhancements
> which offer more than an order of magnitude over standard CORBA wire
> transport, so it aggressively tackles performance considerations as
> well. It is also a highly extensible API.
I thought the consensus was that CORBA is the necessary evil we chose because
there is already an implementation. Even with all the "powerful performance
enhancement" CORBA is still a magnitute slower than most other IPC
mechanisms.
I'm currently fighting hard to sell our product managers the idea that we have
to support a technology which most other vendors abandoned and most of our
programmers don't understand even with training (provided they manage to
install it successfully).
Sorry if that sounded a bit harsh but I think that pro-only CORBA messages are
a bit counter-productive.
Harald
More information about the Accessibility
mailing list