[Accessibility] October 11 FSG Accessibility minutes .
david.bolter at utoronto.ca
Thu Oct 12 09:17:13 PDT 2006
Hi Bill, All,
Agreed! Coincidentally a couple messages earlier in my inbox I received
an email detailing some resources some students here will be using for a
little project. They are developing a firefox toolbar item to check
colour contrast etc. I felt these links might be worth sharing here.
If this kind of thing is inappropriate for this list please let me know.
Color deficiency simulator:
Color perception paper:
Example color contrast ratios:
Color blindness theory:
Study showing accessibility barriers:
(see Table 5 - all groups, except completly blind, identified poor color
contrast as a problem.)
Study showing algorithm can predict which colors people find readable:
Bill Haneman wrote:
> I have a couple of comments about the minutes:
>> We also discussed color themes. Many applications need more colors
>> than KDE and Gnome provide. Will be getting suggestions together.
> This came up again on the gnome-accessibility mailing list, in the
> context of providing color-blindness support for apps that draw things
> like pie charts, etc. it's certainly an important problem that needs a
>> Olaf- has there been any discussion of the accessibility independent
>> of Bill Hanaman?
>> Janina- said there was a meeting in which they got way down into the
>> details. Didn’t do that at the Gnome meeting since many people would
>> have been lost in that discussion. It was mainly an introductory day.
>> We thought we’d have an agenda starting at 8:30 to 5 but the
>> organizers wanted everyone in plenary meetings until 10:30 the morning
>> and after 3 in the afternoon so we had 3 hours less than we expected
>> and things had to be compacted. We had to remove the session on
>> testing and that was moved to Saturday before the access meeting
>> occurred so I missed that.
> We got down into a lot of technical detail on Saturday and again on
> Monday. The plenary sessions were also developer sessions, which took
> place before the break-out groups met. The accessibility-related
> breakout groups and the Saturday accessibility group reported back to
> the morning and afternoon plenary sessions several times over the
> weekend. Some pretty important and encouraging things emerged from this,
> so I think this was a very positive set of meetings.
> On Tuesday and Wednesday I attended a mozilla accessibility
> summit/hackfest which is still going on. Good progress is being made
> there too, and I understand that the latest versions (beta, perhaps?) of
> Firefox 3 already are substantially accessible via orca, which is a big
> improvement over Firefox 2. For stability reasons I would suggest that
> only early adopters and testers use Firefox 3 at the moment, but the
> accessibility support seems much improved.
>> Olaf- the KDE conference was oriented toward developers so it was much
>> more technical.
> There may be some confusion about this in the minutes; actually the
> Gnome conference was intended to be entirely a developer conference as
> well. It is true that some Mass folks showed up who were not developers
> but the focus of the discussions was on topics of relevance to
> developers. In some cases these topics were discussed from an end-user
> perspective but the intended policies and plans that came out of the
> discussion were still aimed at developers. Overall, having attended both
> conferences, I would say the Gnome one was at least as developer-centric
> as the KDE one.
> Accessibility mailing list
> Accessibility at lists.freestandards.org
More information about the Accessibility