[Accessibility] Reviewing IAccessible2 & working to ensure that AT-SPI and IAccessible2 evolve in mutually compatible ways
Li Yuan
Li.Yuan at Sun.COM
Wed Sep 24 01:24:38 PDT 2008
Peter Korn wrote:
> Dear Pete, Li, and the Open Accessibility community,
>
> During the con-call earlier today, we discussed the upcoming vote on
> IAccessible2. During the discussion, we understood that we had
> essentially these two goals for the two accessibility interfaces with
> respect to eachother:
>
> 1. We would like to ensure that AT-SPI and IAccessible2 evolve going
> forward in a way that is as compatible/aligned as possible, in
> order to
> 2. We would like it to be as easy as possible for cross-platform apps
> (e.g. OpenOffice, Firefox/Mozilla, KDE & GNOME generally) to be
> accessible on multiple platforms (Windows via IAccessible2 & UNIX
> via AT-SPI) with the minimum of additional work
>
> While Willie has provided some review and feedback to the list (which
> has been discussed via e-mail), we felt it would be good for the
> AT-SPI maintainer (Li Yuan) to also provide his review & feedback -
> especially given the goals of helping ensure that evolution of these
> two accessibility frameworks were as compatible/aligned as is
> reasonable to do. I also suggested that it would be helpful - again
> in service of these goals - to have a summary of the changes made and
> the reasons for the changes in IAccessible2 since it branched from the
> UNO Accessibility framework from which it came.
>
> To that end, Pete - could you please produce such a summary for
> IAccessible2? Likewise, Li - can you summarize the key
> changes/additions to AT-SPI over the last 2 years, and what they were
> in service of?
From interface side, the key change for at-spi in the past 2 years is
collection interface.
>
>
> I think with these summaries (and with your review of Pete's summary
> and the IAccessible2 spec. Li), we will be in a good place to both
> vote on IAccessible2 becoming a formal specification of the Open A11y
> group and also to ensure that both specifications continue to evolve
> in compatible ways.
>
I am glad to. But it may take some time. I am working on other
accessibility issues now.
Thanks,
Li
More information about the Accessibility
mailing list