[Accessibility] 03/30 Open A11y meeting minutes
Peter Korn
peter.korn at oracle.com
Mon Apr 12 16:07:56 PDT 2010
Pete,
Whether or not TDDs are being phased out (or simply falling into
disuse), key is that there's all these new, non-analog technologies with
which TDDs cannot interoperate. So some other mechanism is needed for
real-time-text communication in those mediums.
Regards,
Peter Korn
Accessibility Principal
Oracle
> Thanks Peter. TDDs are real time devices. Are TDDs being phased
> out? That would make sense with the availability of mobile devices,
> iPads, netbooks, and laptops.
>
> Peter Korn wrote:
>> Pete,
>>
>> Real-time-text does not refer to human-speech-to-ASCII/UNICODE-text.
>> Rather, it refers to two people communicating via text, each
>> typically entering text from some flavor of keyboard, with their
>> keystrokes being transmitted "in real time" as they are entered.
>> Rather than only being transmitted after pressing a SEND key
>> equivalent (e.g. <CR>). This is seen as particularly important for
>> E911 services, where someone might not be in a position to say
>> everything and then press SEND.
>>
>> You could certainly hook up a dictation system to this, but that
>> would be an additional layer on top of the ANPRM RTT requirement, not
>> a part of it. At least as I understand the ANPRM.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Peter Korn
>> Accessibility Principal
>> Oracle
>>
>>> Regarding the minutes, regarding the following:
>>>
>>> PK: ... The refresh adds a bunch of new rules. One of the notable
>>> additions is real-time text for the deaf and a much more significant
>>> effort on the deaf and on communication technologies
>>>
>>> PB: On the speech reco angle, did they talk about whether it was
>>> good enough for what we want to do?
>>>
>>> PK: I don't remember any mention of speech recognition. The NRPM
>>> says at a high level that someone without hands needs to be able to
>>> use your app. Doesn't specifically mention speech recognition. Apps
>>> that support audio and video chat must also support real-time text.
>>>
>>> This is an accurate representation of the exchange during the
>>> meeting, but what I really was asking is, in the case where speech
>>> reco might be used to transcribe speech, will the current (or near
>>> in) state of the art of speech reco technology be able to provide
>>> acceptable real-time text, considering the challenge of large
>>> vocabularies, speaker independence, the variety of speakers, and
>>> conversational speech? Or do the requirements allow for the use of
>>> real time human transcribers (either local or remote)?
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Pete Brunet*
>>>
>>> a11ysoft - Accessibility Architecture and Development
>>> (512) 238-6967 (work), (512) 689-4155 (cell)
>>> Skype: pete.brunet
>>> IM: ptbrunet (AOL, Google), ptbrunet at live.com (MSN)
>>> http://www.a11ysoft.com/about/
>>> Ionosphere: WS4G
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accessibility mailing list
>>> Accessibility at lists.linux-foundation.org
>>> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility
>>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accessibility mailing list
> Accessibility at lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/accessibility/attachments/20100412/f11eee18/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Accessibility
mailing list