[Accessibility] minutes Open A11y call 2011-03-08 [draft]

[Gregory J. Rosmaita]

aloha, peter!

thank you for the corrections/edits -- i have updated the hypertext
version of the minutes with the wording you provided

http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Accessibility/Minutes/Minutes20110308#TOPIC_3:_21st_Century_Video_and_Communications_Act_Review

thanks again, gregory.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Accessibility, Internationalization, and Interoperability are not
"features", "overlays" or "add-ons".  Rather, they are core 
components of any architecture -- programmatic or otherwise.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
    Gregory J. Rosmaita, gregory at linux-foundation.org
Vice-Chair, WebMaster & Listmaster, Open Accessibility Workgroup
http://a11y.org/                              http://a11y/specs
-----------------------------------------------------------------

---------- Original Message -----------
From: Peter Korn <peter.korn at oracle.com>
To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus at hicom.net>
Cc: accessibility at lists.linuxfoundation.org
Sent: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:21:17 -0800
Subject: Re: [Accessibility] minutes Open A11y call 2011-03-08 [draft]

> Gregory,
> 
> Some correction to the minutes.  In Topic 3:
> 
>     * /*PK:* might be interesting to review section around 
> events and      notifications; also section on 
> telecommunications probably of      interest to JS -- congress 
> directed FCC to do this for      interconnected and non-
> interconnected VOIP --      freeswitch.rednote.net would thus 
> have to pay -- general question      about free software 
> services and laws/regulations made by sole      monopoly AT&T /
> 
>       should be:
> 
>     * *PK:* might be interesting to review section around events 
> and      notifications; also section on telecommunications 
> *relay fund*      probably of interest to JS -- congress 
> directed FCC to *have this      cover* interconnected and non-
> interconnected VOIP --      freeswitch.rednote.net would thus 
> *potentially* have to pay *into      this fund *-- general 
> question about free software services *as      these 
> *laws/regulations *were *made *years ago, when the only      
> telco was *monopoly AT&T
> 
>     * /*PK:* will asterisk need to support that? acquires audio portion
>       of SIP connection /
> 
>       should be:
> 
>     * *PK:* will asterisk need to support that? *requires *audio 
> portion      of SIP connection
> 
>     * /*PK:* advanced communications: propose covers not just 
> SMS, IRC      but also email, arguing every app should be 
> accessible ,so when      buying phone that does SMS or email,
>  needs to have built-in AT;      but if on desktop, what does 
> "built-in" mean? whole model of      desktop integration not 
> understood by politicians when law drafted /
> 
>       should be:
> 
>     * *PK:* advanced communications: *NPRM appears to see this term
>       *cover*ing* not just SMS, *IM *but also email, *and by the 
> law,      every advanced communication *app should be accessible,
>  so when      buying phone that does SMS or email, *it should 
> potentially *have      built-in AT; but if on desktop, what does 
> "built-in" mean? *our      *model of desktop *accessibility: 
> platform, app, accessibility      framework, and AT* not 
> *encompassed *by law *when *drafted
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Peter
------- End of Original Message -------
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/accessibility/attachments/20110308/eacab37e/attachment.htm