[agl-discussions] OS/Common Libs Recipe Development

[Kengo Ibe]

 Hi Tanikawa-san, Jonathan-san,

I apologize for my delay to adding the 10 packages.

Janathan-san, Tadano-san, and I discussed about OS and Common Libs in
the e-mail.
And, we are thinking that these should be added to
"packagegroup-agl-core-os-commonlibs.bb".

============from our mail============
If I understand that linked E-mail correctly, you intend to add 10
packages to the packagegroup "packagegroup-ivi-common-os-commonlibs.bb".
Searching for those files by name, it looks like all those packages
exist in poky.

It is my understanding that the layer meta-ivi-common is meant for
packages that are ivi-specific, but ought to be common in all IVI
distributions.

I would suggest that they fit better in the packagegroup
"packagegroup-agl-core-os-commonlibs.bb" found at
'./meta-agl/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-agl-core-os-commonlibs.bb'
Also, I would prefer if these patches were submitted via the gerrit
(gerrit.automotivelinux.org), though if that proves difficult, I will be
happy to review those patches over E-mail.
========================

Could you please tell me advice about which is better
"packagegroup-agl-core-os-commonlibs.bb” or
"packagegroup-ivi-common-os-commonlibs.bb”?
And, please share a policy of packagegroups, if you have.

By the way, I confirmed that the above two cases can build with the 10
packages by bitbake, correctly.


Best regards,
ibe

2015-08-21 12:26 GMT+09:00 Kengo Ibe <kengo.ibe at linuxfoundation.org>:
>  Hi Tanikawa-san,
>
> Thank you for preparing new packagegroup.
>  I'll try to add these packages since next week because I'm on an
> business trip until this weekend.
>
> Regards,
> Kengo Ibe.
>
>
>
> 2015-08-19 16:40 GMT+09:00 Tadao Tanikawa <tanikawa.tadao at jp.panasonic.com>:
>> Hi Ibe-san
>>
>> (2015/08/19 16:22), Kengo Ibe wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>>>>
>>>>> (3) Dependency of the 10 files
>>>>> We attached documents about dependency of them.
>>>
>>> I apologize for having forgetting to attach the document, I sent it
>>> vis this email.
>>> The below 10 files are ready to commit to main branch.
>>>   1. glib-networking_2.38.0.bb
>>>   2. iptables_1.4.21.bb
>>>   3. parted_3.1.bb
>>>   4. procps_3.2.8.bb
>>>   5. quota_4.01.bb
>>>   6. tcp-wrappers_7.6.bb
>>>   7. unzip_6.0.bb
>>>   8. libcgroup_0.41.bb
>>>   9. os-release.bb
>>> 10. libarchive_3.1.2.bb
>>
>>
>> Please add these packages to packageroup in meta-ivi-common (new layer I
>> will add soon).
>>
>> There is new packagegroup 'packagegroup-ivi-common-os-commonlibs.bb'
>> at meta-agl/meta-ivi-common/recipes-core/packagegroups
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tadao Tanikawa
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards.
>>> Kengo Ibe.
>>>
>>> 2015-08-19 4:19 GMT+09:00 Walt Miner <wminer at linuxfoundation.org>:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Ibe-san,
>>>> Thank you for the analysis. What is the next step?
>>>>
>>>> Walt
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Kengo Ibe
>>>> <kengo.ibe at linuxfoundation.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   Hi everyone
>>>>>
>>>>> I and Tadano-san tried to sort out recipe files of OS/CommonLib layer
>>>>> and check some files.
>>>>> The 23 files are included in current package list as OS/Common Libs of
>>>>> AGL Package Group,
>>>>> but not included in the agl-image-ivi.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then, we checked that 10 files related OS/CommonLib can be submitted
>>>>> to main branch,
>>>>> when these are needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> The following are the details:
>>>>>
>>>>> (1) Sorted out 23 files of OS/CommonLib layer
>>>>> 5 files: systemd related files.
>>>>> Because how to handle systemd and sysvinit is under discussion, we
>>>>> don't check them, yet.
>>>>> 7 files: Already included the agl-image-ivi, as different version or
>>>>> duplicate files.
>>>>> 1 file: Fuse package.
>>>>> It’s included in GENIVI layer and, how to handle GENIVI layer is under
>>>>> discussion.
>>>>> We don’t check them, yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> -> We decided to check the remaining 10 files that might be needed in
>>>>> future.
>>>>>
>>>>> (2) Checked the 10 files to be included in poky
>>>>> Procedure is to add package name into below recipe.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ##OEROOT##/../meta-agl/meta-agl/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-agl-core-os-commonlibs.bb
>>>>>
>>>>> e.g. case of adding glib-networking
>>>>> =============================
>>>>> RDEPENDS_${PN} += "\
>>>>>　　    glib-networking "
>>>>> =============================
>>>>>
>>>>> -> We checked that the 10 files can be added into agl-image-ivi,
>>>>> properly.
>>>>>     When these are needed, we can submit it to main branch, smoothly.
>>>>>
>>>>> (3) Dependency of the 10 files
>>>>> We attached documents about dependency of them.
>>>>>
>>>>> -> We think there is no complicated dependency, as of now.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> best regards
>>>>> Kengo Ibe
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> automotive-discussions mailing list
>>>>> automotive-discussions at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/automotive-discussions
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Walt Miner
>>>> Engineering Project Manager
>>>> The Linux Foundation
>>>> mobile: +1.847.502.7087
>>>> skype: vstarwalt
>>>>
>>>> Visit us at:
>>>> automotive.linuxfoundation.org
>>>> www.linuxfoundation.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> automotive-discussions mailing list
>>>> automotive-discussions at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/automotive-discussions
>>
>>
>>
>>