[agl-discussions] Raspi can't compile: Can't get CWD

Jan-Simon Möller dl9pf at gmx.de
Tue Jan 24 16:55:06 UTC 2017


To look into that I need to reproduce your env. Please send:

output of:

-  repo manifest -r
-  repo status

attach also :
conf/local.conf

Best,
Jan-Simon

Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2017, 16:03:09 schrieb Blayne.Dennis at elektrobit.com:
> Is it possible for yocto to run multiple processes against the same recipe?
> In which case there might be a conflict from one process deletes files it
> no longer needs but the other requires, causing the race condition? 
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Ohly [mailto:patrick.ohly at intel.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 4:39 AM
> To: Dennis Blayne <Blayne.Dennis at elektrobit.com>
> Cc: dl9pf at gmx.de; automotive-discussions at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [agl-discussions] Raspi can't compile: Can't get CWD
> 
> On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 21:39 +0000, Blayne.Dennis at elektrobit.com wrote:
> 
> > I just reran the commands in a new terminal:
> > 
> > devel at agl-worker-sdldev-VirtualBox-0-sdldev:~/workspace_agl/build$ 
> > source meta-agl/scripts/aglsetup.sh -f -m raspberrypi3 agl-demo 
> > agl-netboot agl-appfw-smack
> > 
> > devel at agl-worker-sdldev-VirtualBox-0-sdldev:~/workspace_agl/build$ 
> > bitbake agl-demo-platform
> > 
> > 
> > The same error occurs:
> > 
> > | Can't get CWD: No such file or directory Couldn't stash directory 
> > | before opening socket: Stale file handlepseudo: server connection
> > | persistently failed, aborting.
 Aborted (core dumped)
> > | WARNING: exit code 134 from a shell command.
> > | ERROR: Function failed: do_install (log file is located at 
> > | /home/devel/workspace_agl/build/tmp/work/cortexa7hf-neon-vfpv4-agl-l
> > | inux-gnueabi/dbus/1.10.6-r0/temp/log.do_install.24665)
> > 
> > ERROR: Task 3212
> > (/home/devel/workspace_agl/poky/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus_1.10.6.bb,
> > do_install) failed with exit code '1'
> 
> To me, that looks like the current working directory of the process got
> deleted while the process is still using it, i.e. it's some kind of race
> condition. That this then leads to an error from pseudo would be just a
> follow-up error.
 
> --
> Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
> 
> The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an
> employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's
> position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on
> this matter.
 
> 
> 

-- 
--
Jan-Simon Möller
dl9pf at gmx.de


More information about the automotive-discussions mailing list