[Bitcoin-development] Changes for version 0.6 are being pulled into HEAD
luke at dashjr.org
Wed Dec 21 17:37:39 UTC 2011
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:17:57 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Luke-Jr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:12:43 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Luke-Jr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> >> > Accepted for 0.6:
> >> > * 81807c3 (pull 719) Coinbaser
> >> This is not "accepted" as discussed yesterday on IRC. You need to
> >> find buy-in from some other miners to make sure this is what "they"
> >> want, rather than just what "you" want.
> > It was per Gavin on IRC before yesterday.
> Quoting IRC yesterday,
> <gavinandresen> jgarzik: I defer to your judgement on coinbaser, I don't
[Friday, December 02, 2011] [1:57:14 PM] <gavinandresen> luke-jr: ok-- there
seems to be general consensus to pull coinbaser for 0.6, so I'll probably pull
it before op_eval and rework the op_eval code to use coinbaser.
> > And there is already buy-in from other miners.
> Then post data backing up that vague statement.
At least Eclipse (235 GH/s) is using it, and slush (1.3 TH/s) intends to.
More information about the bitcoin-dev