[Bitcoin-development] Alternative to OP_EVAL

Luke-Jr luke at dashjr.org
Thu Dec 29 17:06:42 UTC 2011

On Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:01:20 PM roconnor at theorem.ca wrote:
> This is not adequate: <data> OP_SHA256 OP_EVAL runs random code that is
> more than 5 bytes.

So what? Why shouldn't I be able to run random code? I could always put that 
random code in the script verbatim, after all.

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list