[Bitcoin-development] Reconsidering block version number use

Mike Hearn mike at plan99.net
Tue Jul 24 07:58:24 UTC 2012


> That'd be 7 bytes of nonce in the block header, which is
>   72,057,594,037,927,936  ~ 72 petahashes = 72,000 terahashes
>
> So: the changes for version 2 blocks would be "has height in the
> coinbase, and has a 1-byte version number with a 3-byte extranonce."

I don't understand why more nonce bits are necessary. Is it really
impossible for a multi-core CPU to keep up with the merkle root
re-calculation and keep an ASIC miner fed, or is this working around a
performance bottleneck somewhere else?




More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list