[Bitcoin-development] Punishing empty blocks?

Arthur Britto ahbritto at gmail.com
Thu May 24 17:05:29 UTC 2012

I think you need the stronger change.  Otherwise, the mystery miner could
just put in a few transactions to himself to mask his block.  His block
would appear to be of some use while not being helpful.


On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at exmulti.com> wrote:

> There appears to be some non-trivial mining power devoted to mining
> empty blocks.  Even with satoshi's key observation -- hash a fixed
> 80-byte header, not the entire block -- some miners still find it
> easier to mine empty blocks, rather than watch the network for new
> transactions.
> Therefore I was wondering what people thought about a client
> implementation change:
>     - Do not store or relay empty blocks, if time since last block < X
>       (where X = 60 minutes, perhaps)
> or even stronger,
>     - Ensure latest block includes at least X percent of mempool
> unconfirmed TXs
> The former is easier to implement, though there is the danger that
> no-TX miners simply include a statically generated transaction or two.
> The latter might be considered problematic, as it might refuse to
> relay quickly found blocks.
> Comments?  It wouldn't be a problem if these no-TX blocks were not
> already getting frequent (1 in 20).
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> exMULTI, Inc.
> jgarzik at exmulti.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20120524/a20243f8/attachment.html>

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list