[Bitcoin-development] A critique of bitcoin open source community

Jean-Paul Kogelman jeanpaulkogelman at me.com
Mon Oct 21 06:52:45 UTC 2013

How about putting them into sub directories that map onto the status of the BIP? 

Reading BIP 1, that would make: 


Would that place NODE_BLOOM and BIP 38 in Deferred?

On 2013-10-20, at 11:43 PM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:40:26PM -0700, Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote:
>> I was wondering, would it be possible to create an area where proposals like your NODE_BLOOM and BIP 38 could live? 
> Sure, I think Jeff mentioned the idea of a specific drafts/ directory
> within the repository. (could also do a rejected/)
> Less of an issue in some ways when it's all in git - just point people
> to your bips fork.
> -- 
> 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> 00000000000000099eaa116fac83a2b0e097cae3391c794990e128c8e162d91a

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131020/9af62985/attachment.sig>

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list