[Bitcoin-development] A critique of bitcoin open source community

[Jean-Paul Kogelman]

The list comes from BIP 1.

On 2013-10-21, at 12:03 AM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:

> On 21/10/13 08:52, Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote:
>> How about putting them into sub directories that map onto the status of the BIP?
>> 
>> Reading BIP 1, that would make:
>> 
>> Accepted
>> Active
>> Draft
>> Deferred
>> Final
>> Rejected
>> Replaced
>> Withdrawn
> 
> Have it been considered to do this via IETF? The process there is hardened by 40 years of experience and 7000+ RFCs. Probably better than anything you can devise yourself.
> 
> Martin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131021/bce168ec/attachment.sig>