[Bitcoin-development] A critique of bitcoin open source community

Jean-Paul Kogelman jeanpaulkogelman at me.com
Mon Oct 21 09:49:02 UTC 2013


On 2013-10-21, at 2:44 AM, Arto Bendiken <arto at bendiken.net> wrote:

> 
> Indeed. The BIP analogs that immediately come to mind would be the
> enhancement proposal processes for Python, XMPP, and BitTorrent:

Bitcoin's BIP process is directly based off of Python's PEP process. 

Quote from BIP 1, History:

This document was derived heavily from Python's PEP-0001. In many places text was simply copied and modified.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131021/327b7918/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131021/327b7918/attachment.sig>


More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list