[Bitcoin-development] Revisiting the BIPS process, a proposal
jeanpaulkogelman at me.com
Mon Oct 21 19:38:37 UTC 2013
I have some more questions.
1) Should the protocol specification page also be codified into BIP(s)?
2) Should the current wiki pages be taken down / forwarded to the git repo or be auto updated from the git repo?
3) Even though the information in BIP 50 is valuable, should it really be considered a BIP?
On Oct 21, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote:
The goal is to improve the process, hash-seal our specs, and create an
easy way for anyone with at least an email address to participate.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bitcoin-dev