[Bitcoin-development] Revisiting the BIPS process, a proposal
luke at dashjr.org
Mon Oct 21 19:47:58 UTC 2013
On Monday, October 21, 2013 7:38:37 PM Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote:
> 1) Should the protocol specification page also be codified into BIP(s)?
Probably wouldn't hurt, but it'd likely need a rewrite in a more modular and
> 2) Should the current wiki pages be taken down / forwarded to the git repo
> or be auto updated from the git repo?
Since it's the same format, I'd keep it up there, maybe with a link to the git
repo on the main BIP index wiki page.
> 3) Even though the information in BIP 50 is valuable, should it really be
> considered a BIP?
It's a hardforking protocol change, so IMO yes.
More information about the bitcoin-dev