[Bitcoin-development] Why are we bleeding nodes?
gmaxwell at gmail.com
Mon Apr 7 17:16:03 UTC 2014
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Mark Friedenbach <mark at monetize.io> wrote:
> On 04/07/2014 09:57 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> That is an implementation issue— mostly one that arises as an indirect
>> consequence of not having headers first and the parallel fetch, not a
>> requirements issue.
> Oh, absolutely. But the question "why are people not running full
> nodes?" has to do with the current implementation, not abstract
> capabilities of a future version of the bitcoind code base.
The distinction is very important because it's a matter of things we
can and should fix vs things that cannot be fixed except by changing
goals/incentives! Opposite approaches to handling them.
When I read "resource requirements of a full node are moving beyond" I
didn't extract from that that "there are implementation issues that
need to be improved to make it work better for low resource users" due
to the word "requirements".
More information about the bitcoin-dev