[Bitcoin-development] Why are we bleeding nodes?
justusranvier at gmail.com
Mon Apr 7 17:46:12 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 04/07/2014 05:16 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> When I read "resource requirements of a full node are moving
> beyond" I didn't extract from that that "there are implementation
> issues that need to be improved to make it work better for low
> resource users" due to the word "requirements".
In order to prevent future confusion: whenever I talk about
requirements (or generally use the present tense) , I'm talking about
reality as it currently exists.
If I ever decide to talk about hypothetical future requirements in
some imaginary world of Platonic forms, as opposed to the requirements
imposed by the software that's actually available for casual users to
download today, I'll mention that specifically.
Support online privacy by using email encryption whenever possible.
Learn how here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bakOKJFtB-k
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 21191 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the bitcoin-dev