[Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure

[Pavol Rusnak]

On 04/23/2014 10:32 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> f) I missed the part where BIP 32 redefined "account" to mean "subwallet" 
> instead of what has traditionally been called "account" in Bitcoin.

Ah, okay. The last time I saw Bitcoin-qt it was still using independent
addresses.

> In that case, single-subwallet wallet software probably needs to have the user 
> provide a subwallet number in addition to the seed.

Which brings us back to my original complaint that the user can be
confused because he doesn't see all his funds.

-- 
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol Rusnak <stick at gk2.sk>