[Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure

[Pavol Rusnak]

On 04/23/2014 11:42 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> In that case, maybe it makes sense to define another purpose id
> without accounts as well already.
> 
> I believe many simple wallets will find multiple subwallets too
> burdening for the user experience, or not worth the technical
> complexity.

Right. See my previous email where I describe hypothetical creation of
BIP65 and BIP66 which the exact thing you describe.

-- 
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol Rusnak <stick at gk2.sk>