[Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension
gavinandresen at gmail.com
Tue Jun 24 20:12:09 UTC 2014
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Gmail <will.yager at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, wanting structured data is a decent argument, but why this random
> arbitrary case in particular? There are hundreds of fields like this that
> people might want to use.
Protocol buffers are designed to be extensible, and there are hundreds of
field numbers available.
It would be silly to add a "generic stuff" field inside a container format
that ALREADY has all the mechanisms necessary for forwards and backwards
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bitcoin-dev