[Bitcoin-development] 75%/95% threshold for transaction versions

Stephen Morse stephencalebmorse at gmail.com
Sat Apr 25 14:32:36 UTC 2015

Hi William,

I personally prefer this solution, since it nails the problem
> completely with one simple and obvious change. The BIP 62 approach is
> more like a game of wac-a-mole.

The two are complementary, not competing. BIP62 prevents *non-signers* from
mutating the transactions, which is very important. The 'Build your own
nHashType' proposal enables chained transactions even in the face of
*signers* mutating the transaction. I believe that integrating both will
lead to the best defense against transaction malleability, and will enable
more complicated uses of chained transactions (such as micropayment

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150425/155f2e23/attachment.html>

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list